Electronic Monitoring in the Penal System
Keywords:
electronic monitoring, offender, criminal sanctions, crimeAbstract
This paper represents a brief analysis of electronic monitoring of offenders in the criminal justice system. After brief historical oversee authorees are describing types of electronical equipment which is used for realization of this alternative sanction, like as the way of its' realization. Pointing out advantages and deficiencies, in continuation of this paper, they give a brief retrospective of electronic monitoring efficiency in accomplishing goals which are set. This paper concludes with a critical analysis of practical achievement and results of evaluation studies.
References
Blic. (2008, 24. septembar). Zatvorenici služe kazne u bolnicama i domovima. Blic.
Bonta, J., Rooney, J., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (1999). Electronic monitoring in Canada. Solicitor General's Office.
Bonta, J., Rooney, J., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (2000). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 61–75.
Black, M., & Smith, R. G. (2003). Electronic monitoring in criminal justice system. Australian Institute of Criminology: Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
Easley, M. F., & Sweat, G. (2005). Legislative report on electronic monitoring of juveniles, calendar year 2004. State of North Carolina: Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Eichar, P. L. (2006). Chapter 484: From home detention to GPS monitoring. McGeorge Law Review, 37, 284–293.
Fay, S. J. (1992). Electronic monitoring and criminal justice: Some recent developments in Britain. Nottingham Law Journal, 1, 61–90.
Friel, C. M., & Vaughn, J. B. (1986). A consumer's guide to the electronic monitoring of probationers. Federal Probation, 50(2), 38–41.
Gable, R. K., & Gable, R. S. (2005). Electronic monitoring: Positive intervention strategies. Federal Probation, 69, 21–25.
Glaser, D., & Watts, R. (1992). Electronic monitoring of drug offenders on probation. Judicature, 76(3), 112–117.
Gowen, D. (2001). Remote location monitoring: A supervision strategy to enhance risk control. Federal Probation, 65(2), 38–41.
Harig, T. J. (2002). The juvenile electronic monitoring project: The use of electronic monitoring technology on adjudicated juvenile delinquents. New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services.
Haverkamp, R., Mayer, M., & Levy, R. (2004). Electronic monitoring in Europe. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 12(1), 35–45.
Lilly, J. R., Ball, R. A., Curry, D. A., & Smith, R. C. (1992). The Pride Inc. program: An evaluation of five years of electronic monitoring. Federal Probation, 56, 42–47.
Nellis, M. (1989). The electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales: Recent developments and future prospects. British Journal of Criminology, 31, 165–185.
Papy, J. E., & Nimer, R. (1991). Electronic monitoring in Florida. Federal Probation, 55, 31–33.
Roy, S., & Barton, S. (2006). Convicted drunk drivers in electronic monitoring, home detention and day reporting centres: An exploratory study. Federal Probation, 70(1), 49–55.
Soković, S., & Vasiljević, D. (2007). Intermedijarne sankcije. U L. Kron (Ur.), Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja (God. 26, br. 1-2, str. 121–139). Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
Schmidt, A. (1991). Electronic monitoring: Realistically what can be expected? Federal Probation, 55, 47–53.
Schmidt, A. (1998). Electronic monitoring: What does literature tell us? Federal Probation, 62, 10–19.Tracking sex offenders with electronic monitoring technology: Implications and practical uses for law enforcement. (n.d.).
Vaughn, J. B. (1989). A survey of juvenile electronic monitoring and home confinement programs. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 40, 1–36.


