Hate Speech and Political Discourse in the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia: A Comparative Legal Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2025126Keywords:
hate speech, political discourse, freedom of expression, former Yugoslav countries, informed societyAbstract
This paper aims to critically analyze the regulation of hate speech within political discourse in the post-Yugoslav region. Emphasis is placed on two interconnected aspects: the conceptual and normative foundations behind the idea of hate speech, and a comparative review of legal frameworks and judicial responses across selected jurisdictions. The first section conducts a normative and theoretical analysis to clarify the legal and theoretical foundations of hate speech and political expression in general. Using international human rights instruments, relevant jurisprudence, and key theoretical literature, this section outlines the definitional boundaries and core characteristics of hate speech. Special emphasis is placed on the normative tension between protecting political discourse, which is considered the foundation of democratic society, and the legal limits used to protect individuals and groups from incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence. The analysis also tackles the difficulties in differentiating hate speech from controversial or offensive, yet legally acceptable, political expression, especially when discussing sensitive topics like ethnicity, religion, or historical memory. The second section uses a comparative legal approach to examine the regulatory frameworks governing hate speech in the successor states of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Although all these jurisdictions have officially aligned their legal systems with international standards, especially those of the Council of Europe, differences remain in how hate speech is implemented, interpreted, and treated by courts. While Slovenia and Croatia, as EU member states, are bound by the relevant acquis communautaire, the other states, although still outside the EU, have pursued similar legislative paths in anticipation of joining. This section, therefore, examines both the common elements and jurisdiction-specific differences to identify patterns, inconsistencies, and potential best practices. Special focus is given to instances of hate speech that have been influenced by, and still reflect, the ethno-political conflicts and wartime narratives of the 1990s. The main goal of the research is to develop analytically based criteria for distinguishing hate speech from protected political expression, considering the specific contexts of post-conflict, transitional societies in the former Yugoslav countries.
References
Abrams, F. (1992). Hate speech: The present implications of a historical dilemma. Villanova Law Review, 37, 743.
Article 19. (2018). Responding to “hate speech”: Comparative overview of six EU countries. Article 19. https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/ECA-hate-speech-compilation-report_March-2018.pdf (Accessed May 1, 2025)
Badino, M. (2024). Putting hate speech at its place: A political-epistemological perspective. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 13(2), 47–55.
Barendt, E. (2009). Freedom of speech. Oxford University Press.
Barendt, E. (2019). What is the harm of hate speech? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22, 539–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10002-0
Borka, A. (2024). Criminal offense of inciting national, racial, and religious hatred and intolerance. Pravo teorija i praksa, 41(2), 153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2402153B
Brown, A., & Sinclair, A. (2019). The politics of hate speech laws. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553917
Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, Nos. 98/2006 and 115/2021.
Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of November 28, 2008, on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, Official Journal of the European Union, L 328, 6.12.2008.
Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of BiH, No. 3/2003, as amended by Nos. 32/2003, 37/2003, 54/2004, 61/2004, 30/2005, 53/2006, 55/2006, 8/2010, 47/2014, 22/2015, 40/2015, 35/2018, 46/2021, 31/2023, and 47/2023).
Criminal Code of Montenegro (Official Gazette of the Republic of Montenegro, Nos. 70/2003, 13/2004, 47/2006, and Official Gazette of Montenegro, Nos. 40/2008, 25/2010, 32/2011, 64/2011, 40/2013, 56/2013, 14/2015, 42/2015, 58/2015, 44/2017, 49/2018, and 3/2020).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Croatia (Official Gazette, Nos. 125/11, 144/12, 56/15, 61/15, 101/17, 118/18, 126/19, 84/21, 114/22, 114/23, 36/24).
Criminal Code of the Republic of North Macedonia (Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, Nos. 37/96, 80/99, 4/02, 43/03, 19/04, 81/05, 60/06, 73/06, 7/08, 139/08, 114/09, 51/11, 135/11, 185/11, 142/12, 170/13, 27/14, 199/14, 226/15, 97/17, 248/18, 198/18, etc.).
Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 85/2005, 88/2005, 107/2005, 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019, and 94/2024.
Criminal Code, Official Gazette RS, Nos. 50/12 (official consolidated text), 6/16, 54/15, 38/16, 27/17, 23/20, 91/20, 95/21, 186/21, 105/22, and 16/23.
Ćirić, J. (2006). Govor mržnje. Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, 44, 199–222.
Ćirić, J. (2015). Genocidna namera. Crimen, (1), 27–45.
Delić, N. (2016). Krivičnopravni značaj mržnje u svetlu identitetskog preobražaja Srbije. U R. Vasić & M. Polojac (Ur.), Identitetski preobražaj Srbije, prilozi projektu 2015 – kolektivna monografija (str. 127–154). Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Heinze, E. (2006). Viewpoint absolutism and hate speech. Modern Law Review, 69(4), 543–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00599.x
Hietanen, M., & Eddebo, J. (2023). Towards a definition of hate speech—with a focus on online contexts. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 47(4), 440–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221124309
Hlebec, I., & Gardašević, Đ. (2021). Pravna analiza govora mržnje. Pravnik: časopis za pravna i društvena pitanja, 55(107), 9–35.
Kapelańska-Pręgowska, J., & Pucelj, M. (2023). Freedom of expression and hate speech: Human rights standards and their application in Poland and Slovenia. Laws, 12(4), 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12040064
Kojić, T. (2022). Govor mržnje u sferi javnog obraćanja. U Z. Pavlović & M. Ljubičić (Ur.), Govor mržnje (str. 131–154). Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
Law on Electronic Media, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 83/2014, 6/2016, 129/2021, and 92/2023.
Law on Public Information and Media, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 83/2014, 58/2015, 12/2016, 54/2019, 52/2021, and 92/2023.
Nicević, M., & Dečković, S. (2024). Hate crime in the criminal legislation of North Macedonia. Bezbednost, 66(1), 115–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/bezbednost2401115N
Nikolić, P. M. (2018). Govor mržnje u internet komunikaciji u Srbiji [Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet političkih nauka]. NaRDUS. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_10291
Parekh, B. (2012). Is there a case for banning hate speech? In M. Herz & P. Molnár (Eds.), The content and context of hate speech: Rethinking regulation and responses (pp. 37–56). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042871.006
Pavlović, Z. (2022). Hate speech, violence, and the dissemination of false news on the global social networking highway. In Z. Pavlović & M. Ljubičić (Eds.), Hate speech (pp. 155–167). Institute for Criminological and Sociological Research.
Phillipson, G. (2015). Hate speech laws: What they should and should not try to do. Revue générale du droit, 13.
Ramet, S. P. (2007). The dissolution of Yugoslavia: Competing narratives of resentment and blame. Comparative Southeast European Studies, 55(1), 26–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/soeu-2007-550104
Rosenfeld, M. (2002). Hate speech in constitutional jurisprudence: A comparative analysis. Cardozo Law Review, 24, 1523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.265939
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Development and application to terrorism, massacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, 7(3), 299–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.299
Stevanović, A. (2023). Analysing the hate speech within the framework of political discourse. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 42(1), 63–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2023014
Stojanović, Z. (2022). Commentary on the Criminal Code. Službeni glasnik.
Thompson, M. (1996). Forging war: The media in Serbia, Croatia & Bosnia-Hercegovina. Canadian Journal of Communication, 21(1), 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1996v21n1a934
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Vuković, S. (2009). The ethics of Western media: Anti-Serb propaganda in the 1990s. Novi Sad–Sremski Karlovci.
Court decisions
Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444.
Constitutional Court of Montenegro, U-III-6/2016.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia, U-III-1296/2016, dated May 25, 2016.
Delfi AS v. Estonia (ECtHR), 64569/09.
Josip Šimunić v. Croatia (ECtHR), 20373/17.
R. V. Keegstra 3 SCR 697, 748 (1990).
Schenck v. US 249 US 47, 52 (1919).
Smajić v. BiH (ECtHR), 48657/16.
Theophanous v. Herald Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104, 124, HC of A
Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije, Sodba II Kp 65803/2012
Judgment of the Court of Appeals in Belgrade under the case number Kž1 250/14.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright over their published works and grant the publisher a non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be identified as its first publisher in cases of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media. The articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated.
