Bazična struktura ličnosti i psihopatija

Doprinos dezintegracije

Autori

  • Janko Međedović Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, Beograd, Srbija

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2010012128

Ključne reči:

Velikih pet, Dezintegracija, psihopatija, delinkvencija

Apstrakt

Brojna su istraživanja koja pokušavaju da otkriju asocijacije između psihopatije i crta ličnosti iz modela Velikih pet. Međutim, empirijski nalazi o relacijama između psihopatije i šizotipije su veoma retki i ne pružaju jasnu sliku o odnosima ovih personalnih dispozicija. U ovom istraživanju pokušali smo da ispitamo povezanosti između Velikih pet, Dezintegracije, kao konstrukta koji ispituje pro-psihotične crte ličnosti samoprocenjene psihopatije u uzorku adolescenata koji se nalaze na izdržavanju vaspitno-popravne mere.

Istaživanje je izvršeno u Vaspitno-popravnom domu u Kruševcu i u njemu je učestvovalo 78 ispitanika od kojih je 64 na zadovoljavajući način popunilo protokole. Prosečni uzrast ispitanika je bio 18.65 godina, sa standardnom devijacijom od 1.69. Za ispitivanje crta ličnosti iz modela Velikih pet upotrebljen je upitnik BFI, Dezintegracija je merena pomoću instrumenta DELTA 10 a psihopatija pomoću upitnika SRP3.

Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju sistematske značajne pozitivne korelacije Ekstaverzije i negativne korelacije faktora Saradljivosti sa merama psihopatije. Neuroticizam značajno pozitivno korelira jedino sa aspektom psihopatije nazvanim Neobuzdani životni stil. Generalni faktor Dezintegracije pozitivno korelira sa svim merama psihopatije. Većina modaliteta ovog faktora takođe ostvaruje pozitivne povezanosti sa psihopatskim crtama, ali su jedino korelacije Maničnosti, Paranoičnosti i Zaravnjenog afekta značajne na svim aspektima psihopatije. Hijerarhijska linearna regresija ipak jasno ističe prednost crta iz modela Velikih pet nad modalitetima Dezintegracije, kada je u pitanju predikcija psihopatije. Takođe, regresijom "unazad" identifikovani su značajni pojedinačni prediktori od kojih se posebno ističe faktor Saradljivosti, čija je uloga u predikciji stabilna po svim aspektima psihopatije kao kriterijumskim varijablama. Kanoničke korelacione analize potvrdile su ulogu Saradljivosti i Ekstraverzije iz prostora Velikih Pet i Paranoičnosti, Maničnosti i Generalne egzekutivne disfunkcije iz prostora Dezintegracije kao prediktora psihopatskih crta. I najzad, eksploratorna analiza glavnih komponenti izvršena u zajedničkom prostoru sva tri ispitivana konstrukta izolovala je tri putanje pomoću kojih je moguće povezati psihopatiju i bazičnu strukturu ličnosti. Prvu komponentu koja opisuje ove odnose definišu Saradljivost i Zaravnjeni afekat, zajedno sa svim merama psihopatije. Drugu komponentu u najvećoj meri čine Paranoičnost i Maničnost, i u manjoj meri Ekstraverzija, dok Neuroticizam i Savesnost poseduju negativna zasićenja na njoj. Jedini aspekat psihopatije koji zasićuje ovu komponentu je Interpersonalna manipulacija. I najzad, treća komponenta opisana je Neuroticizmom, Generalnom egzekutivnom disfunkcijom i negativnim zasićenjem Socijalne anhedonije, zajedno sa Neobuzdanim životnim stilom kao psihopatskom crtom. Sve izvršene analize rezultirale su u međusobno kongruentnim podacima i daju preciznu sliku o vezama između psihopatije i bazične strukture ličnosti, na uzorku delinkvenata u adolescenciji.

Reference

Baskin-Sommers, A. R., Zeier, J. D., & Newman, J. P. (2009). Self-reported attentional control differentiates the major factors of psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 626–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.027

Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 250–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.01.001

Claridge, G. (1997). Theoretical background and issues. In G. Claridge (Ed.), Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780198523536.003.0001

Claridge, G. (2010). Personality and psychosis. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge University Press.

Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). Mosby.

Cooper, M. L., Agocha, V. B., & Sheldon, M. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 68, 1059–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00126

Corr, P. J. (2010). The psychoticism–psychopathy continuum: A neuropsychological model of core deficits. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 695–703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.023

Davis, K. L., Panksepp, J., & Normansell, L. (2003). The affective neuroscience personality scales: Normative data and implications. Neuropsychoanalysis, 5, 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2003.10773410

Decuyper, M., De Pauw, S., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., & De Clercq, B. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of psychopathy, antisocial PD and FFM associations. European Journal of Personality, 23, 531–565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.729

Derefinko, K. J., & Lynam, D. R. (2007). Using the FFM to conceptualize psychopathy: A test using a drug abusing sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 638–656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.638

Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., Pryor, L. R., & Lynam, D. R. (2009). Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: A test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ. Journal of Personality, 77, 965–995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00571.x

Gillstrom, B. J. (1995). Abstract thinking in criminal psychopaths (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia.

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Gretton, H. M., Hare, R. D., & Catchpole, R. E. H. (2004). Psychopathy and offending from adolescence to adulthood: A 10-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 636–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.636

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems.

Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). Psychopathy and its measurement. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology. Cambridge University Press.

Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the Psychopathy Checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 741–747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.741

Heym, N., & Lawrence, C. (2010). The role of Gray’s revised RST in the P–psychopathy continuum: The relationships of psychoticism with a lack of fear and anxiety, and increased impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 874–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.021

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Kiehl, K. A., Smith, A. M., Hare, R. D., & Liddle, P. F. (2000). An event-related potential investigation of response inhibition in schizophrenia and psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 210–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00834-9

Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Kutlešić, V., & Savić, D. (2005, August 18–21). Preserving psychoticism as a basic personality trait: A proposed reconceptualization. 113th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Kwapil, T. R., Wrobel, M. J., & Pope, C. A. (2002). The five-factor personality structure of dissociative experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 431–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00035-6

Laurell, J., & Dåderman, A. M. (2005). Recidivism is related to psychopathy (PCL-R) in a group of men convicted of homicide. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 28, 255–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.08.008

Lynam, D. R. (2002). Psychopathy from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 325–348). American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10423-020

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765–798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00940.x

Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2010). Psychopathy and the Five-Factor Model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_08

Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions: Can the five-factor model adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00144

O’Connor, B. P. (2005). Graphical analyses of personality disorders in five-factor model space. European Journal of Personality, 19, 287–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.558

Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.524

Raine, A. (1986). Psychopathy, schizoid personality and borderline/schizotypal personality disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 493–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90128-5

Raine, A. (1992). Schizotypal and borderline features in psychopathic criminals. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 717–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90242-H

Ross, S. R., Benning, S. D., & Adams, Z. (2007). Symptoms of executive dysfunction are endemic to secondary psychopathy: An examination of criminal offenders and noninstitutionalized young adults. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 384–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.4.384

Salekin, R. T. (2008). Psychopathy and recidivism from mid-adolescence to young adulthood: Cumulating legal problems and limiting life opportunities. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 386–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.386

Skeem, J. L., Poythress, N., Edens, J. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Cale, E. M. (2003). Psychopathic personality or personalities? Exploring potential variants of psychopathy and their implications for risk assessment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 513–546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(02)00098-8

Van Egeren, L. F. (2009). A cybernetic model of global personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 92–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309334860

Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2003, August 7–10). Structure and validity of Self-Report Psychopathy Scale–3 in normal populations. 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

##submission.downloads##

Objavljeno

2010-06-22

Kako citirati

Međedović, J. (2010). Bazična struktura ličnosti i psihopatija: Doprinos dezintegracije. Zbornik Instituta Za kriminološka I sociološka istraživanja, 29(1–2), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2010012128

Broj časopisa

Sekcija

Članci

Najčitanije od istog autora

1 2 > >> 

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.heading##

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.advancedSearchIntro##