Crossover Youth: Terminological Framework, Empirical Findings, and a Practice Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2026022

Keywords:

crossover youth, dually involved youth, child welfare system, juvenile justice, delinquency

Abstract

This paper focuses on children and youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, a population referred to in the international literature by different terms, including crossover youth, dual system youth, and dually involved youth. The aim of the paper is to clarify the key terminology, systematize empirical findings on factors associated with the delinquent and justice-related outcomes of this population, and present the Crossover Youth Practice Model as an example of a coordinated institutional response, based on a review of relevant literature. The paper points out that these terms are not always used consistently in the literature, which makes it difficult to compare findings and clearly define the population to which the studies refer. The review of empirical findings shows that the delinquent and justice-related outcomes of children and youth in the child welfare system cannot be explained by a single factor, but should instead be understood through the interaction of experiences of abuse and neglect, sociodemographic characteristics, especially gender and age, as well as placement characteristics and experiences within the child welfare system. The paper highlights the importance of recognizing this population at an early stage, ensuring information sharing between systems, providing stable support, and coordinating intervention planning.

References

Baglivio, M. T., Wolff, K. T., Piquero, A. R., Bilchik, S., Jackowski, K., Greenwald, M. A., & Epps, N. (2016). Maltreatment, child welfare, and recidivism in a sample of deep-end crossover youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 625–654.

Baidawi, S., & Sheehan, R. (2019). 'Crossover kids': Offending by child protection-involved youth. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 582. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

Baskin, D. R., & Sommers, I. (2011). Child maltreatment, placement strategies, and delinquency. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 106–119.

Center for Youth Justice. (n.d.). Crossover Youth Practice Model. Georgetown University. Preuzeto 12. maja 2026. sa https://cyj.georgetown.edu/our-work/crossover-youth-practice-model/

Crawford, M. (2021). Crossover youth: A nationally representative study to identify predictors of crossover from foster care to juvenile justice. International Journal of Science Academic Research, 2(5), 1535–1540.

Cutuli, J. J., Goerge, R. M., Coulton, C., Schretzman, M., Crampton, D., Charvat, B. J., Lalich, N., Raithel, J. A., Gacitua, C., & Lee, E. L. (2016). From foster care to juvenile justice: Exploring characteristics of youth in three cities. Children and Youth Services Review, 67, 84–94.

DeGue, S., & Widom, C. S. (2009). Does out-of-home placement mediate the relationship between child maltreatment and adult criminality? Child Maltreatment, 14(4), 344–355.

Flores, J., Hawes, J., Westbrooks, A., & Henderson, C. (2018). Crossover youth and gender: What are the challenges of girls involved in both the foster care and juvenile justice systems? Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 149–155.

Frederiksen, S. (2012). Empirical essays on placements in outside home care [Doctoral dissertation, Aarhus University]. https://pure.vive.dk/ws/files/2085466/empirical-essays-on-placements-in-outside-home-care.pdf

Goodkind, S., Shook, J. J., Kim, K. H., Pohlig, R. T., & Herring, D. J. (2013). From child welfare to juvenile justice: Race, gender, and system experiences. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(3), 249–272.

Haight, W. L., Bidwell, L. N., Marshall, J. M., & Khatiwoda, P. (2014). Implementing the Crossover Youth Practice Model in diverse contexts: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals’ experiences of multisystem collaborations. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 91–100.

Herz, D. C., Dierkhising, C. B., Raithel, J., Schretzman, M., Guiltinan, S., Goerge, R. M., Cho, Y., Coulton, C., & Abbott, S. (2019). Dual system youth and their pathways: A comparison of incidence, characteristics and system experiences using linked administrative data. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(12), 2432–2450.

Herz, D. C., Ryan, J. P., & Bilchik, S. (2010). Challenges facing crossover youth: An examination of juvenile-justice decision making and recidivism. Family Court Review, 48(2), 305–321.

Herz, D., Lee, P., Lutz, L., Stewart, M., Tuell, J., & Wiig, J. (2012). Addressing the needs of multi-system youth: Strengthening the connection between child welfare and juvenile justice. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University; Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps. https://publicaffairs.osbar.org/files/2016/10/MultiSystemYouth_March2012.pdf

Huang, H., Ryan, J. P., & Herz, D. (2012). The journey of dually-involved youth: The description and prediction of rereporting and recidivism. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 254–260.

Huang, H., Ryan, J. P., Sappleton, A., & Chiu, Y.-L. (2015). Crossover youth post arrest: Placement status and recidivism. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 193–200.

Jonson–Reid, M. (2002). Exploring the relationship between child welfare intervention and juvenile corrections involvement. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(4), 559–576.

Jonson–Reid, M., & Barth, R. P. (2000). From maltreatment report to juvenile incarceration: The role of child welfare services. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(4), 505–520.

Jugović, A., & Brkić, M. (2010). Socijalna zaštita i prevencija maloletničkog prestupništva: Uloge, kontroverze i dobre prakse. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 4(4), 435–452.

Lindquist, M. J., & Santavirta, T. (2014). Does placing children in foster care increase their adult criminality? Labour Economics, 31, 72–83.

Malvaso, C. G., Delfabbro, P. H., & Day, A. (2017). Child maltreatment and criminal convictions in youth: The role of gender, ethnicity and placement experiences in an Australian population. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 57–65.

Oriol–Granado, X., Sala-Roca, J., & Filella Guiu, G. (2015). Juvenile delinquency in youths from residential care. European Journal of Social Work, 18(2), 211–227.

Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. F. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(3), 227–249.

Ryan, J. P., Marshall, J. M., Herz, D., & Hernandez, P. M. (2008). Juvenile delinquency in child welfare: Investigating group home effects. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1088–1099.

Simmons–Horton, S. Y. (2021). “A bad combination”: Lived experiences of youth involved in the foster care and juvenile justice systems. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38, 583–597.

Vidal, S., Prince, D., Connell, C. M., Caron, C. M., Kaufman, J. S., & Tebes, J. K. (2017). Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 7–18.

Williams–Butler, A. (2018). Reducing delinquency among African American youth in foster care: Does gender make a difference in crossover prevention? Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 563–571.

Yamat, A. M. (2020). The foster-care-to-prison pipeline. Justice Policy Journal, 17(2), 1–11. https://www.cjcj.org/media/import/documents/the_foster_care_to_prison_pipeline.pdf

Yampolskaya, S., & Chuang, E. (2012). Effects of mental health disorders on the risk of juvenile justice system involvement and recidivism among children placed in out-of-home care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(4), 585–593.

Yang, J., McCuish, E., & Corrado, R. (2021). Is the foster care-crime relationship a consequence of exposure? Examining potential moderating factors. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 19(1), 94–112.

Yang, J., McCuish, E., & Corrado, R. R. (2017). Foster care beyond placement: Offending outcomes in emerging adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 53, 46–54.

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Vasić, M. (2026). Crossover Youth: Terminological Framework, Empirical Findings, and a Practice Model. Zbornik Instituta Za kriminološka I sociološka istraživanja, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2026022

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.