Democratic Psychiatry in Italy as an Idea and a Movement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2023034

Keywords:

antipsychiatry, democratic psychiatry, depsychiatrization, Law 180, Trieste experiment, deinstitutionalization

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is, based on the analysis of secondary sources, to provide an overview of the origin and development of a specific thought and movement in Italy that advocated the deconstruction and reform of traditional psychiatry and its practice in the sixties and seventies of the last century. Democratic psychiatrists in Italy understood the process of democratization of psychiatry as a process of deinstitutionalization of psychiatric power and ’depsychiatrization’ in theory and practice, which refers to the reexamination of classifications, diagnoses and techniques used by psychiatrists. Thanks to their political commitment, the Law on Psychiatry (Law 180) from 1978 prohibited the construction of new psychiatric hospitals, prevented the transformation of psychiatric hospitals at that time into profiled departments of general hospitals, reduced the number of beds in psychiatric wards in general hospitals, and introduced more rigorous criteria for compulsory hospitalization, which consequently led to its complete abolition. Asylum-type psychiatric institutions are still almost completely eradicated in Italy, while the passing of Law 180 made Italy, historically speaking, the first country with such a progressive law in psychiatry, the variants of which were accepted a decade later in other European countries (Germany, Greece, Hungary, etc.). Although the reform of psychiatry in Italy led to the humanization of psychiatric treatment and the relocation of psychiatry to the social community, the advantages and disadvantages of the achievements of democratic psychiatry in Italy, in the context of the contemporary global-capitalist society, should be empirically examined, for which this paper could serve as a guideline.

References

Basaglia, F. O. (1989). The psychiatric reform in Italy: Summing up and looking ahead. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 35(1), 90–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002076408903500110

De Girolamo, G., Bassi, M., Neri, G., Ruggeri, M., Santoni, G., & Picardi, A. (2007). The current state of mental health care in Italy: Problems, perspectives, and lessons to learn. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 257(2), 83–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-006-0695-x

Donnelly, M. (1992). The politics of mental health in Italy. Routledge.

Foot, J. (2014). Franco Basaglia and the radical psychiatry movement in Italy, 1961–1978. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(2), 235–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/204986014X14002292074708

Gewirth, A. (1949). Political power and democratic psychiatry. Ethics, 59(2), 136–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/290656

Glas omladine. (1987, May). Lepa Mlađenović, (anti)psihologistkinja: Menjati odnos prema ljudima koji pate. Yugopapir.

Guaiana, G., & Barboni, C. (2004). Trends in the use of the Italian Mental Health Act 1979–1997. European Psychiatry, 19(7), 444–445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.07.004

Guattari, F. (2009). Chaosophy: Texts and interviews 1972–1977. Semiotext(e).

Jerinić, A. (2017). Deinstitucionalizacija – humani pristup psihički oboljelim osobama [Diplomski rad]. Sveučilište u Dubrovniku.

Jervis, G. (1978). Kritički priručnik psihijatrije. Stvarnost.

Kecmanović, D. (1980). Psihijatrija. Medicinska knjiga; Svijetlost.

Kecmanović, D. (2008). Psihijatrija u kritičkom ogledalu. Službeni glasnik.

Kecmanović, D. (2010). Očima psihijatra. Clio.

Kron, L. (2008). Totalne ustanove i stigmatizacija. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 27(1–2), 171–183.

Mlađenović, L. (2016, November 25). Antipsihijatrijski pokret i deinstitucionalizacija. Akcija za ljudska prava.

Morzycka-Markowska, M., Drozdowicz, E., & Nasierowski, T. (2015). Deinstitutionalization in Italian psychiatry – The course and consequences: Part II. The consequences of deinstitutionalization. Psychiatria Polska, 49(2), 403–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/28614

Nikolić, Z., & Kron, L. (2011). “Totalne” ustanove i deprivacije. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 30(1–2), 119–137.

Opalić, P. (2008a). Psihijatrijska sociologija. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

Opalić, P. (2008b). Neki aspekti odnosa između psihijatrije i politike. Sociološki pregled, 42(3), 385–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg0803385O

Radio Kotor. (2016, November 29). Mlađenović: Zatvorimo bolnice koje ne liječe već ponižavaju.

Rašković-Ivić, S. (2011). Deinstitucionalizacija psihijatrije u Srbiji: Argumenti za i protiv. Engrami, 33(4), 2–6.

Štrkalj-Ivezić, S., Jendričko, T., Pisk, Z., & Martić-Biočina, S. (2014). Terapijska zajednica. Socijalna psihijatrija, 42(3), 172–179.

Visoka škola socijalnog rada u Beogradu. (n.d.). Evaluacija procesa deinstitucionalizacije – službe za negu u zajednici.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Gojković, T. (2023). Democratic Psychiatry in Italy as an Idea and a Movement. Zbornik Instituta Za kriminološka I sociološka istraživanja, 42(2–3), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2023034

Issue

Section

Articles