Koncepti sreće i blagostanja u socijalnim i bihejvioralnim naukama
Ključne reči:
subjektivno blagostanje, sreća, kvalitet života, socijalne i bihejvioralne naukeApstrakt
Cilj rada jeste naučna analiza pojmova i koncepcija subjektivnog blagostanja, sreće i kvaliteta života i njihov značaj za socijalne i bihejvioralne nauke, kroz primenu analize i sinteze empirijskih i teorijskih nalaza kao opštih metoda korišćenih u radu. Pored toga, u radu su analizirani empirijski nalazi o subjektivnom blagostanju, kao i dva teorijska postulata koji definišu preduslove blagostanja – teorija zadovoljenja potreba i teorija hedonizma. Važnost pojmova blagostanja za bihejvioralne nauke se može ogledati u dobitima sreće na individualnom i šire društvenom nivou. Dobiti na individualnom nivou se ogledaju kroz rezultate brojnih studija koje pokazuju da su sreća (zadovoljstvo životom, pozitivna osećanja i nizak nivo negativnih osećanja) i uspeh u različitim životnim domenima u pozitivnoj korelaciji, uključujući zdravlje, partnerske i socijalne odnose, prihode, radni učinak i prosocijalno ponašanje. Kroz zaključna razmatranja pojedinih studija da visoki nivoi subjektivnog blagostanja jednog naroda mogu voditi ka stabilnijem i produktivnijem društvu u celosti, ogleda se šira dobit sistema od rada na unapređenju subjektivnog
Reference
Aiken, W. (1982). The quality of life. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1(1), 26–36.
Bagdonienė, D. (2000). Gyvenimo kokybės ir gyventojų kokybės sąvokų apibrėžimas. Ekonomika ir vadyba, 46–48.
Batz, C., & Tay, L. (2018). Gender differences in subjective well-being. In Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
Bogetić, D. (2017). Karakteristike kvaliteta života dece uključene u život i/ili rad na ulici [Neobjavljen master rad]. Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Bognar, G. (2005). The concept of quality of life. Social Theory and Practice, 31, 561–580.
Davidson, R. J. (2001). Toward a biology of personality and emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935, 191–207.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (2018). Happiness: The science of subjective well-being. In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds.), Noba textbook series: Psychology. DEF Publishers.
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406.
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2012). A scientific review of the remarkable benefits of happiness for successful and healthy living. Happiness, 90.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2008). Rethinking happiness: The science of psychological wealth. Blackwell Publishing.
Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425.
Duncan, G. (2005). What do we mean by “happiness”? The relevance of subjective well-being to social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 25, 16.
Fitzpatrick, R. (1996). Quality of life and health: Concepts, methods and applications. Health Policy, 37, 53–72.
Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 427.
Gutiérrez, J. L. G., Jiménez, B. M., Hernández, E. G., & Peñacoba Puente, C. (2005). Personality and subjective well-being: Big five correlates and demographic variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1561–1569.
Helliwell, J. F., & Barrington-Leigh, C. P. (2010). Measuring and understanding subjective well-being. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 43(3), 729–753.
Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. Culture and Subjective Well-Being, 3(2), 91–317.
Lucas, R. E. (2018). Exploring the associations between personality and subjective well-being. In Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803.
Moore, A. (2000). Objective human goods. In R. Crisp & B. Hooker (Eds.), Well-being and morality: Essays in honour of James Griffin (pp. 75–89). Clarendon Press.
Musschenga, A. W. (1997). The relation between concepts of quality of life, health and happiness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 22, 11–28.
Myers, D., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10–17.
Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of life and sustainability. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2, 103–112.
Potter, J., Cantarero, R., & Wood, H. (2012). The multi-dimensional nature of predicting quality of life. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 781–790.
Richard, E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In The science of well-being (pp. 75–102). Springer.
Shin, D. (1979). The concept of quality of life and the evaluation of development effort. Comparative Politics, 299–304.
Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D., & Samli, A. C. (2003). Advances in quality-of-life theory and research. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Spicker, P. (2014). Socijalna politika – teorija i praksa. Fakultet političkih nauka.
Susnienė, D., & Jurkauskas, A. (2009). The concepts of quality of life and happiness: Correlation and differences. Inzinerine Ekonomika–Engineering Economics, 3, 58–66.
Ulloa, B. F. L., Møller, V., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2013). How does subjective well-being evolve with age? A literature review. Journal of Population Ageing, 6(3), 227–246.
Van Hoorn, A. (2007). A short introduction to subjective well-being: Its measurement, correlates and policy uses. International conference “Is happiness measurable and what do those measures mean for policy?”, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”.
Van Hoorn, A. A. J. (2009). Measurement and public policy uses of subjective well-being. Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE), Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.
Veenhoven, R. (2005). Apparent quality of life in nations: How long and happy people live. Social Indicators Research, 71, 61–68.
Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations: Is there a conflict between individual and society? Social Indicators Research, 91, 5–21.
Ventegodt, S., Hilden, J., & Merrick, J. (2003). Measurement of quality of life I: A methodological framework. ScientificWorldJournal, 13, 950–961.
Živaljević, D. (2015). Obeležja i socijalna zaštita populacije beskućnika u Republici Srpskoj i Srbiji (Doktorska disertacija). Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Fakultet političkih nauka.
General Social Survey. (2018, November 22). http://gss.norc.org/
Eurofound. (2018, November 22). https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim radovima i daju izdavaču neeskluzivno pravo da objavi članak, da bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač u slučaju ponovne upotrebe i da ga distribuira u svim oblicima i medijima. Članci će biti distribuirani pod licencom Creative Commons Attribution International (CC BY 4.0), osim ako nije drugačije naznačeno.
