Privacy and Digital Literacy: Who Is Responsible for the Protection of Personal Data in Serbia?

Authors

  • Ivana Stepanović Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia

Keywords:

privacy, personal data, digital literacy, digital identities, GDPR

Abstract

While privacy laws fail to fully protect personal data in a digital form, especially considering capacities for storing it and the speed of sharing and multiplying it, individuals are responsible for safeguarding their privacy online and taking steps to prevent abuse. However, this requires technical skills and digital literacy, which entails up-to-date knowledge on digital privacy protection and use of a whole set of devices, software, browser extensions and encryption techniques. The General Data Protection Regulation is an attempt to redeem control over privacy protection and divide responsibility between users and other subjects such as data controllers, data processors and other authorities. However, in countries outside the EU where citizens are not protected by the GDPR, the emphasis is much more on individual responsibility. The aim of this paper is to stress out the importance of dividing responsibility for privacy protection among different actors in Serbia.

References

Baker, E. A. (Ed.). (2010). The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice. The Guilford Press.

Baruh, L., & Popescu, M. (2015). Big data analytics and the limits of privacy self-management. New Media & Society, 19(4), 579–596.

Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 27–32.

Choi, H., Park, J., & Jung, Y. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42–51.

Gilliom, J., & Monahan, T. (2012). SuperVision: An introduction to the surveillance society. University of Chicago Press.

Hajdin, M. (2018). Privacy and responsibility. In A. Cudd & M. Navin (Eds.), Core concepts and contemporary issues in privacy (Vol. 8). Springer.

Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622.

Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1–14.

Heller, C. (2011). Post-privacy: Prima leben ohne Privatsphäre. Verlag C. H. Beck.

Friesem, Y. (2019). Teaching truth, lies, and accuracy in the digital age: Media literacy as project-based learning. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 74(2), 185–198.

Krish, C., et al. (2018). Bridging the digital divide: Measuring digital literacy. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 12(23), 1–20.

Kuzmanović, D. (2017). Empirijska provera konstrukta digitalne pismenosti i analiza prediktora postignuća (Doktorska disertacija). Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Lyon, D. (2010). Surveillance, power and everyday life. In P. Kalantzis-Cope & K. Gherab-Martín (Eds.), Emerging digital spaces in contemporary society. Palgrave Macmillan.

Meyrowitz, J. (2002). Post-privacy America. In R. Weiß & J. Groebel (Eds.), Privatheit im öffentlichen Raum (Vol. 43). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Moll, R., & Pieschl, S. (2016). Expecting collective privacy: A new perspective on trust in online communication. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and communication in a digitized world (pp. 239–251).

Moreham, N. A. (2006). Privacy in public places. The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), 606–635.

Nissenbaum, H. (1998). Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17(5–6), 559–596.

Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Personal data literacies: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437.

Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018). Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions. Journal of Cybersecurity, 4(1).

Prlja, S. (2018). Pravo na zaštitu privatnih podataka u EU. Strani pravni život, 1, 89–99.

Rose, N. (1991). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Free Association Books.

Rosenthal, S., et al. (2019). A tripartite model of trust in Facebook: Acceptance of information personalization, privacy concern, and privacy literacy. Media Psychology.

Schaar, P. (2009). Das Ende der Privatsphäre. Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag.

Trepte, S., et al. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “Online Privacy Literacy Scale” (OPLIS). In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, & P. de Hert (Eds.), Reforming European data protection law (Vol. 20). Springer.

Wrenn, M. V., & Waller, W. (2017). Care and the neoliberal individual. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(2), 495–502.

General Data Protection Regulation. (n.d.). Retrieved September 8, 2019, from https://gdpr-info.eu/

Poverenik za informacije od javnog značaja i zaštitu podataka o ličnosti. (n.d.). Retrieved September 8, 2019, from https://www.poverenik.rs/sr/

Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti. (2018). Službeni glasnik RS, 87.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-23

How to Cite

Stepanović, I. (2019). Privacy and Digital Literacy: Who Is Responsible for the Protection of Personal Data in Serbia?. Zbornik Instituta Za kriminološka I sociološka istraživanja, 38(3), 45–56. Retrieved from https://zbornik-iksi.rs/index.php/home/article/view/394

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.