Savremene tendencije policijskog postupanja u nemačkom krivičnoprocesnom zakonodavstvu
Ključne reči:
policija, prethodni postupak, legitimitet, međunarodni standardApstrakt
Komparativna analiza krivičnoprocesnih zakonodavstava Evrope implicira na savremene tendencije konzistentnosti, kao i na pretenzije dostižanja ideala pravičnosti kao međunarodni standard. Segment konzistentnosti se najbolje može sagledati kroz analiziranje krivičnoprocesnih instituta, koji su u velikom stepenu preuzeti iz nemačkog krivičnoprocesnog zakonodavstva, između ostalog i u krivičnoprocesno procesno zakonodavstvo Republike Srbije (načelo oportuniteta i dr.), dok se kada je reč o realizaciji međunarodnog standarda, policija izdvaja kao izuzetno bitan subjekat prethodnog, odnosno istražnog krivičnog postupka Savezne Republike Nemačke, koja uspešno odgovara svim izazovima savremenog društva, čime se još jednom ukazuje na značaj navedenog subjekta za dostizanje efikasnosti krivičnog postupka uopšte. Postavljanje savremenih temelja policijskog postupanja u SR Nemačkoj, uz implementaciju elemenata anglosaksonskog pravnog sistema, određuju determinante adekvatnog normativnog okvira i legitimiteta policije, koje su posmatrano iz ugla autora određene kroz sledeća pitanja: Prvo, policija kao ključni subjekat prethodnog krivičnog postupka (uvodna razmatranja); korelacija javnog tužioca i policije kao instrument efikasnosti krivičnog postupka; treće, policija i međunarodni standard lišenja slobode; legitimitet policije u SR Nemačkoj i zaključna raztatranja.
Reference
Albrecht, H. (2000). Criminal prosecution: Developments, trends and open questions in the Federal Republic of Germany. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 8, 245–256.
Ahlf, E.-H. (1985). Das Bundeskriminalamt als Zentralstelle. BKA-Forschungsreihe.
Bejatović, S. (2005). The position and role of the police in pre-trial and the previous criminal proceedings in the German criminal procedural legislation. Viša škola unutrašnjih poslova.
Beulke, W. (2008). Strafprozessrecht (10th ed.). Müller.
Blankenburg, E., & Treiber, H. (1985). The establishment of the public prosecutor’s office in Germany. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 375.
Bugarski, T. (2014). Direct accusation. In S. Bejatović (Ed.), The prosecutorial investigation: Regional criminal procedure legislation and experience in applying (pp. 221–233). OSCE.
Bošković, G., & Čvorović, D. (2014). Charges and abbreviated criminal procedure. In S. Bejatović (Ed.), Charges and other instruments of state criminal justice responses to crime (pp. 426–441). Serbian Association for Criminal Law Theory and Practice.
Čvorović, D., & Turanjanin, V. (2015). The role of the jury in the French criminal procedure. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 217–233.
Čvorović, D. (2016). Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade.
Čvorović, D., & Turanjanin, V. (2017). Police arrest and habeas corpus procedure in the criminal procedure legislation of the Federal Republic of Germany (Doctrine, casuistry of the European Court). In Đ. Đorđević (Ed.), Thematic conference proceedings of international significance (pp. 341–353). Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies.
Criminal Procedure Code of the Federal Republic of Germany (Strafprozessordnung). (2018).
Đurđić, V. (2014). Conceptual downward in the new Criminal Procedure Code of Serbia. In G. Ilić (Ed.), Reform of criminal law (pp. 66–87). The Association of Public Prosecutors and Deputy Public Prosecutors of Serbia.
Geisler, W. (1981). Stellung und Funktion der Staatsanwaltschaft im heutigen deutschen Strafverfahren. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 1109.
Hall, E. D. (2012). Criminal law and procedure. Delmar Cengage Learning.
Hessel, H.-J. (1979). Gesetz über die Einrichtung eines Bundeskriminalpolizeiamtes (BKA-Gesetz): Commentary.
Ilić, G. (2014). Some prosecutorial experience in the implementation of the new CPC. In S. Bejatović (Ed.), Charges and other instruments of state criminal justice responses to crime (pp. 176–187). Serbian Association for Criminal Law Theory and Practice.
Jung, H. (1986). Legalität oder Opportunität im Strafverfahren. In H. Prütting (Ed.), Recht und Gesetz im Dialog III (pp. 55–72).
Kühne, H. (2010). Strafprozessrecht: Eine systematische Darstellung des deutschen und europäischen Strafverfahrensrechts (8th ed.). Müller.
Koch, K. F., & Risch, H. (1991). Police research in the Federal Republic of Germany (pp. 5–10). Springer.
Meyer-Goßner, L. (2011). Strafprozessordnung, Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, Nebengesetze und ergänzende Bestimmungen (Beck’scher Kurzkommentar StPO) (54th ed.). C. H. Beck.
Mergen, A. (1987). Die BKA story.
Policing and justice in Europe: Police and justice systems in the United Kingdom, France, Federal Republic of Germany, Spain, and Denmark. (1987). International Criminal Police Review, 42(407), 9–12.
Roxin, C., & Schünemann, B. (2012). Strafverfahrensrecht: Ein Studienbuch (27th ed.). C. H. Beck.
Riess, P. (1981). Die Zukunft des Legalitätsprinzips. Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 2.
Del Carmen, R. V. (2010). Criminal procedure law and practice (pp. 32–57). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Skulić, M. (2014a). Charges and measures to ensure the presence of the defendant and the smooth conduct of criminal proceedings. In S. Bejatović (Ed.), Charges and other instruments of state criminal justice responses to crime (pp. 143–176). Serbian Association for Criminal Law Theory and Practice.
Skulić, M. (2014b). Misconception and numerous technical error of the new Code of Criminal Procedure: What next and how to reform the Serbian reform process. In G. Ilić (Ed.), Reform of the criminal law (pp. 23–65). Association of Public Prosecutors and Deputy Public Prosecutors of Serbia.
Störzer, H. U. (1991). Police research in the Federal Republic of Germany (p. 29). Springer.
Tintor, J. (2014). Defence counsel as subject of confirmation of the indictment. In S. Bejatović (Ed.), Charges and other instruments of state criminal justice responses to crime (pp. 305–332). Serbian Association for Criminal Law Theory and Practice.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim radovima i daju izdavaču neeskluzivno pravo da objavi članak, da bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač u slučaju ponovne upotrebe i da ga distribuira u svim oblicima i medijima. Članci će biti distribuirani pod licencom Creative Commons Attribution International (CC BY 4.0), osim ako nije drugačije naznačeno.
