Koncept terapijske jurisprudencije kao model formalnog društvenog reagovanja na kriminalitet
Ključne reči:
terapeutska jurisprudencija, krivičnopravni proces, krivično delo, izvršilac krivičnog dela, dobrobitApstrakt
Institucionalna reakcija na kriminal je zasnovana na formalnopravnom normiranju i primeni normi. Terapeutska jurisprudencija menja tradicionalnu krivičnopravnu perspektivu na krivično delo, zasnivajući je novu perspektivu na analiziranju interakcija među akterima u pravnim procedurama i posledicama koje nastaju tim interakcijama. Polazeći od razumevanja prava kao regulatora društvenih odnosa koji omogućava njihovo unapređivanje, u centru koncepta terapeutske jurisprudencije su posledice normiranja i primene normi koje su usmerene na čoveka, emocije i psihološku dimenziju funkcionisanja pravnog poretka.
Autorke u radu ukazuju na mogućnosti terapeutske jurisprudencije da utiče na konvergenciju subjektivne i objektivne dobrobiti kao rezultata optimizacije društvenih odnosa u kontekstu kompletne, realne slike vrednosti u društvu. Cilj ovog rada je da ukaže na perspektivu primene terapeutske jurisprudencije i njen potencijal da intenzivira traženje boljih načina i puteva da se problemi koji se tradicionalnom krivičnopravnom represijom ne mogu rešiti, rešavaju na jedan drugi, adekvatniji način.
Reference
Birgden, A. (2002). Therapeutic jurisprudence and “good lives”: A rehabilitation framework for corrections. Australian Psychologist, 37(3), 180–186.
Bulatović, A. (2015). Restorativna pravda i odnos učinioca i žrtve. Temida, 13(3–4), 131–144.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38(2), 244–262.
Brehm, J. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
Clark, D. M. (2001). Change-focused drug courts: Examining the critical ingredients of positive behavior change. National Drug Court Institute Review, 35(44–46), 48–56.
Cooper, C. S. (2000). Drug court survey report: Program operations, services and participant perspectives (Executive summary). U.S. Department of Justice.
Daicoff, S. (2005). Law as a healing profession: The “comprehensive law movement.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 6(1), 1–61.
Daicoff, S. (2000). The role of therapeutic jurisprudence within the comprehensive law movement. In D. P. Stolle, D. B. Wexler, & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 465–492). Carolina Academic Press.
Diesen, C. (2007). Therapeutic jurisprudence—An introduction from a Swedish perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 51, 131–162.
Freiberg, A. (2007). Non-adversarial approaches to criminal justice. Journal of Judicial Administration, 16(4), 205–223.
Goldkamp, S. J. (1999). The origin of the treatment court in Miami. In The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation. Sage Publications.
Halder, D. (2015). Cyber stalking victimisation of women: Evaluating the effectiveness of current laws in India from restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudential perspectives. Temida, 13(3–4), 103–130.
Harris, N., Walgrave, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2004). Emotional dynamics in restorative conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 8(2), 191–210.
Hora, F. P., & Chase, J. D. (2000). The implications of therapeutic jurisprudence for judicial satisfaction. Court Review, 12–20.
Hora, F. P., Schma, T. J., & Rosenthal, A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system’s response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74(2), 439–537.
Jugović, A., & Brkić, M. (2010). Socijalna zaštita i prevencija maloletničkog prestupništva: Uloge, kontroverze i dobre prakse. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, IV deo: Socijalna politika i socijalni rad, 435–452.
King, S. M. (2009). Restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence and the rise of emotionally intelligent justice. Melbourne University Law Review, 32, 1096–1126.
King, S. M. (2008). Therapeutic jurisprudence, child complainants and the concept of a fair trial. Criminal Law Journal, 32(5), 313–330.
King, S. M., et al. (2009). Non-adversarial justice. Federation Press.
King, S. M., & Ford, S. (2006). Exploring the concept of wellbeing in therapeutic jurisprudence: The example of the Geraldton alternative sentencing regime. eLaw Journal, Special Series 9, 9–26.
Klotz, J. (1996). Sex offenders and the law: New directions. In D. Wexler & B. Winick (Eds.), Law in a therapeutic key (pp. 131–143). Carolina Academic Press.
McMahon, M., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence. Federation Press.
Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2003). Welcome home? Examining the reentry court concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 91–107.
Meichenbaum, D., & Turk, D. C. (1987). Facilitating treatment adherence: A practitioner’s guidebook (pp. 72–79). Plenum Press.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press.
O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research. Sage.
Petrucci, C. (2002). Respect as a component in the judge–defendant interaction in a specialized domestic violence court that utilizes therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 28(2), 263–295.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–162.
Pound, R. (1912). Social problems and the courts. American Journal of Sociology, 18(3), 331–341.
Randal, B. F., & Simon, M. J. L. (2000). The development of a specialized domestic violence court in Vancouver, Washington utilizing innovative judicial paradigms. UMKC Law Review, 69(2), 139–177.
Silver, A. M. (1999). Love, hate, and other emotional interference in the lawyer/client relationship. Clinical Law Review, 6, 259–263.
Simon, L. (1996). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 43–79.
Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(1), 193–219.
Stojanović, Z. (2011). Preventivna funkcija krivičnog prava. Crimen, 2(1), 3–25.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1997). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Carolina Academic Press.
Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key. Carolina Academic Press.
Winick, B. J. (1998). Legal counseling about advance directive instruments: Client denial and resistance in the advance directive context: Reflections on how attorneys can identify and deal with a psycholegal soft spot. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(3), 901–909.
Winick, B. J. (Ed.). (1997). The right to refuse mental health treatment. American Psychological Association.
Winick, B. J. (1992). On autonomy: Legal and psychological perspectives. Villanova Law Review, 37(6), 1715–1721.
Winick, B. J. (2002). Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem solving courts. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30(3), 1055–1103.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim radovima i daju izdavaču neeskluzivno pravo da objavi članak, da bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač u slučaju ponovne upotrebe i da ga distribuira u svim oblicima i medijima. Članci će biti distribuirani pod licencom Creative Commons Attribution International (CC BY 4.0), osim ako nije drugačije naznačeno.
