Povezanost psihosocijalnih karakteristika i responzivnosti osuđenih na primenjeni penitensijarni tretman
Ključne reči:
tretman, osuđena lica, psihosocijalne karakteristike, responzivnostApstrakt
Bazirajući se na rezultatima dosadašnjih istraživanja u oblasti primene penitensijarnog tretmana, u određenju predmeta rada se pošlo od toga dа korektivna rehabilitacija mora biti prilagođena karakteristikama osuđenih, kako bi penitensijarni tretman počivao na naučnim osnovama i bio efikasan.
Osnоvni cilј rada je usmеrеn nа аnаlizu povezanosti psiho socijalnih karakteristika uzorka od 220 osuđenih lica muškog pola i primene trеtmаnа u okviru Kazneno-popravnog zavoda u Beogradu – Padinskoj Skeli, Kazneno-popravnog zavoda u Sremskoj Mitrovici, Kazneno-popravnog zavoda za muškarce u Požarevcu i Kazneno-popravnog zavoda za maloletnike u Valjevu.
Za prikupljanje podataka je korišćen instrument Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment – CJ CEST (Simpson, 2004), odnosno Upitnik samoprocene osuđenih u tretmanu, dok su u statističkoj obradi podataka primenjene deskriptivna statistika, srednje vrednosti, standardna devijacija, Pirsonov koeficijent korelacije i koeficijent determinacije, a radi utvrđivanja koeficijenta relijabilnosti primenjenog instrumenta korišćen je Cronbachov α-koeficijent.
Dobijeni rezultati istraživanja su ukazali na to da uz statističku značajnost p = 0.01 i proporciju od 19.2% varijabiliteta postoji umerena korelacija (r = .438) između skale Osetljivosti na tretman i Psihološkog funkcionisanja osuđenih lica, da uz statističku značajnost od p = 0.03 i proporciju od 2.1% varijabiliteta postoji veoma niska korelacija (r = .146) između skala Osetljivosti na tretman i Socijalnog funkcionisanja osuđenih lica, zatim da uz statističku značajnost od p = 0.01 i proporciju varijabiliteta od 9.5% postji niska korelacija (r = .308) između skala Angažovanosti u tretmanu osuđenih lica i Psihološkog funkcionisanja osuđenih lica, dok je najniži koeficijent korelacije, uz proporciju od 0.8% varijabiliteta, uočen između skala Angažovanosti osuđenih u tretmanu i Socijalnog funkcionisanja osuđenih lica (r = .092), pri čemu on nema snagu statističke značajnosti (p = 0.48), pa povezanost između ovih skala gotovo i da ne postoji.
U okviru zaključnih razmatranja se kao najznačajnijim može izvesti stav da je polazna hipoteza istraživanja potvrđena, s obzirom na to da je responzivnost osuđenih na primenjeni penitensijarni tretman umereno pozitivno povezana sa psihosocijalnim karakteristikama ispitivanog uzorka osuđenih lica.
Reference
Adams, K., & Ferrandino, J. (2008). Managing mentally ill inmates in prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(8).
Ahmad, H., Ramalingum, S., & Ahmad, S. (1984). Drug abuse and personality: A cross-cultural study. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 11(1).
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). LexisNexis/Matthew Bender.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1). American Psychological Association.
Beck, A. J., & Maruschak, L. M. (2001). Mental health treatment in state prisons, 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Berry, G. W., & Sipps, G. J. (1991). Interactive effects of counselor-client similarity and client self-esteem on termination type and number of sessions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(2).
Bogue, B., Campbell, N., & Clawson, E. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections. National Institute of Corrections.
Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective intervention to a “real world” setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32.
Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4).
Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the ‘Big 3’ higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, 40.
Chien, I. (1980). Psychological, social, and epidemiological factors in juvenile drug use. In D. J. Lettieri, M. Sayers, & H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives (NIDA Research Monograph 30; DHHS Publication No. ADM80-967). U.S. Government Printing Office.
De Leon, G. (1984). The therapeutic community: Study of effectiveness, social and psychological adjustment of 400 dropouts and 100 graduates from the Phoenix House therapeutic community. National Institute on Drug Abuse.
De Leon, G., & Jainchill, J. (1986). Circumstances, motivation, readiness and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18.
Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. The Lancet, 359.
Fazel, S., & Baillargeon, J. (2011). The health of prisoners. The Lancet, 377, 956–965.
Frank, A., Green, V., & McNeil, D. W. (1993). Adolescent substance users: Problem-solving ability. Journal of Substance Abuse, 5.
Garner, B. R., Knight, K., Flynn, P. M., Morey, J. T., & Simpson, D. D. (2007). Measuring offender attributes and engagement in treatment using the Client Evaluation of Self and Treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(9).
Garrett, M., & Lerman, M. (2007). CBT for psychosis for long-term inpatients with a forensic history. Psychiatric Services, 58(5).
Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1).
Godišnji izveštaj o radu uprave za izvršenje krivičnih sankcija za 2012. godinu. (2013). Uprava za izvršenje krivičnih sankcija Ministarstva pravde i državne uprave Republike Srbije.
Hodel, B., & West, A. (2003). A cognitive training for mentally ill offenders with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 14(3).
Joe, G. W., Knezek, L., Watson, D., & Simpson, D. D. (1991). Depression and decision-making among intravenous drug users. Psychological Reports, 68.
Joe, G. W., Broome, K. M., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4).
Karoly, P. (1980). Person variables in therapeutic change and development. In P. Karoly & J. J. Steffen (Eds.), Improving the long-term effects of psychotherapy. Gardner.
Kovačević, R., & Kecman, B. (2007). Komparativna analiza osobina ličnosti izvršilaca seksualnih, imovinskih i delikata protiv života i tela. Engrami, 29(1–2).
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the Five-Factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
Malow, R. M., Corrigan, S. A., Pena, J. M., Calkins, A. M., & Bannister, T. M. (1992). Mood and HIV risk behavior among drug-dependent veterans. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 6(2).
Međedović, J. (2009). Bazična struktura ličnosti i kriminalitet. Primenjena psihologija, 2(3).
Miller, W. R. (1985). Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin, 98.
Motiuk, L. L., & Porporino, F. J. (1991). The prevalence, nature and severity of mental health problems among federal male inmates in Canadian penitentiaries. Correctional Service Canada.
Murray, L., & Singer, S. I. (1988). Delinquency, substance abuse, and risk taking in middle-class adolescents. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 6(3).
Namir, S., Wolcott, D. L., Fawzy, F. I., & Alumbaugh, M. J. (1987). Coping with AIDS: Psychological and health implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(3).
Nelson, L. D., & Cicchetti, D. (1991). Validity of the MMPI depression scale for outpatients. Psychological Assessment, 3(1).
Powell, J. E., & Taylor, D. (1992). Anger, depression, and anxiety following heroin withdrawal. International Journal of the Addictions, 27(1).
Rouillon, F., Duburq, A., Fagnagni, F., & Falissard, B. (2004). Étude épidémiologique sur la santé mentale des personnes détenues en prison. INSERM.
Saunders, B., & Allsop, S. (1987). Relapse: A psychological perspective on psychology and addiction. British Journal of Addiction, 82(4).
Serin, R., Lloyd, C. D., & Hanby, L. (2010). Enhancing offender re-entry: An integrated model for enhancing offender re-entry. European Journal of Probation, 2(2).
Simpson, D. D., & Sells, S. B. (1990). Opioid addiction and treatment: A 12-year follow-up. Krieger Publishing.
Simpson, D. D., & Knight, K. (2003). TCU model of treatment process and outcomes in correctional settings. In J. A. Gondles (Ed.), The state of corrections (pp. 211–222). American Correctional Association.
Simpson, D. D. (2004). A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27.
Simpson, D. D., & Knight, K. (2007). Offender needs and functioning assessments (Special issue). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(9).
Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences. Solicitor General of Canada.
Vennard, J., & Hedderman, C. (1998). Effective interventions with offenders. In P. Goldblatt & C. Lewis (Eds.), Reducing offending: An assessment of research evidence on ways of dealing with offending behavior (p. 187). Home Office.
Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation. Routledge.
##submission.downloads##
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
Licenca
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2014 Ivana D. Petrović
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim radovima i daju izdavaču neeskluzivno pravo da objavi članak, da bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač u slučaju ponovne upotrebe i da ga distribuira u svim oblicima i medijima. Članci će biti distribuirani pod licencom Creative Commons Attribution International (CC BY 4.0), osim ako nije drugačije naznačeno.
