Social Networking of Privacy

Authors

  • Vesna Žunić-Pavlović Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Marina Kovačević-Lepojević Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Serbia
  • Borko Lepojević Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Serbia, Serbia

Keywords:

social networking, privacy, internet, protection

Abstract

Since the late nineties, when there was a revival of the multiplier concept of social networking on the Internet, public attention has focused on the study of the negative aspects of the functioning of social networking sites, especially complaints relating to abuse of privacy. The results of the research on the routine activities of social networking site users show that more than half of users share their personal information. On the other hand, the safety platforms of social networking sites are weak. A particular problem is the unauthorized collection of data on citizens' communications by the security agencies of the developed countries of the world as part of the activities related to the prevention of terrorism and crime.

The aim of this article is to assess the negative consequences of social networking in the context of privacy issues. Besides the review of the international and domestic laws on social networking sites, some safety instructions for users and social networking sites will be given.

References

Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on Facebook. In G. Danezis & P. Golle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 36–58). Robinson College.

Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.

Council of Europe. (1981). Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data. Council of Europe.

Debatin, B. (2011). Ethics, privacy, and self-restraint in social networking. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web. Springer.

Donoso, V. (2011). Assessment of the implementation of the safer social networking principles for the EU on 14 websites: Summary report. European Commission, Safer Internet Programme.

European Court of Human Rights. (2010). European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Council of Europe.

European Network and Information Security Agency. (2007). Security issues and recommendations for online social networks.

European Union. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal, L 281, 31–50.

European Commission. (2009). Safer social networking principles for the EU. European Union.

Facebook. (2013). Global government requests report.

European Union. (1998). Directive 97/66/EC. Official Journal, L 024, 1–8.

Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Stony Brook University.

Google. (2013). Google transparency report: User data requests.

Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the workshop on privacy in the electronic society (WPES) (November 5, Alexandria).

International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications. (2008). Report and guidance on privacy in social network services: Roma memorandum (43rd meeting, March 3–4, Rome, Italy).

Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks. Pew Research Center.

Ustavni sud Republike Srbije. (2013). Odluka broj IVz-1245/2010 o ustavnosti odredbi Zakona o elektronskim komunikacijama.

Pempek, A., Yermolayeva, Y., & Calvert, S. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.

Poverenik za informacije od javnog značaja i zaštitu podataka o ličnosti Republike Srbije. (2013). Izveštaj o sprovođenju Zakona o slobodnom pristupu informacijama od javnog značaja i Zakona o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti za 2012. godinu. Poverenik.

Zakon o bezbednosno-informativnoj agenciji Republike Srbije. (2002/2009). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 42/2002 i 111/2009.

Zakon o zaštiti podataka o ličnosti Republike Srbije. (2008). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 97/08.

Zakon o elektronskim komunikacijama Republike Srbije. (2010). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 44/10.

Zakon o telekomunikacijama Republike Srbije. (2003). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 44/03.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Republike Srbije. (2011/2012). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/2011, 101/2011 i 121/2012.

Zakon o Vojnobezbednosnoj agenciji i Vojnoobaveštajnoj agenciji Republike Srbije. (2009/2012/2013). Službeni glasnik RS, br. 88/2009, 55/2012 i 17/2013.

Van den Berg, B., & Leenes, R. (2011). Keeping up appearances: Audience segregation in social network sites. In S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, & P. De Hert (Eds.), Computer privacy and data protection: An element of choice (pp. 211–233). Springer.

Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227–253.

White, J., & Mannon, S. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-01

How to Cite

Žunić-Pavlović, V., Kovačević-Lepojević, M., & Lepojević, B. (2013). Social Networking of Privacy. Zbornik Instituta Za kriminološka I sociološka istraživanja, 32(1), 49–60. Retrieved from https://zbornik-iksi.rs/index.php/home/article/view/192

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.